Film vs. Film: High Sierra vs I Died a Thousand Times

poster20-20high20sierra_02

film20noir20poster20-20i20died20a20thousand20times_01

Classic film noir fans didn’t see to many remakes of a film, with both being made during the classic film noir era. Here is a rare example of just that, High Sierra from 1941 was remade 14 years later as I Died a Thousand Times. So what film is the better movie? I sat down on a Sunday afternoon and watched both of these films back to back to try and answer that question.

Both of these films are based on noir author W.R. Burnett’s book, High Sierra from 1941.

corgi-536burnetthighsierra

Round 1: Screen play 

The screenplay is also by W.R. Burnett, though he had John Huston’s help with High Sierra. The dialog is about 85% identical and the story is about 95% identical. It isn’t quite a frame for frame re-make, but it is close.  I would call this a wash, but since the remake basically does not add anything to the original, I’m giving this round to High Sierra. Score: High Sierra 1-I Died a Thousand Times 0

Round 2: Direction and Cinematography 

High Sierra is directed by Raoul Walsh coming off of directing They Drive by Night. I Died a Thousand Times is directed by Stuart Heisler towards the end of his film career as he moved on to television. High Sierra is filmed in black and white while I Died was filmed in Warner Color and CinemaScope. I know, “this is film noir so black and white has to win this battle.” I would say yes to this question most of the time. Black and white cityscapes are the back bone of film noir after all, but this film is more of a country noir, taking place in the beautiful Sierra Mountains for most of the film. Those mountains sure do look better in bright color and on a widescreen. High Sierra is early in the film noir cycle and doesn’t have much of that classic shadowy cinematography like later films either. So I’m giving this round to I Died. High Sierra 1-I Died a Thousand Times 1

idiedathousandtimes1

Round 3: The Male Lead

I Died stars the hulking brute Jack Palance as Roy. He is quite a presence on the screen. He looks big and tough and talks big and tough. He is more of a smart thug.  Humphrey Bogart’s star is on the rise here, The Maltese Falcon would arrive later in 1941 and launch him into super stardom. Bogart’s portrayal is more of a smart gangster with a bit of a psycho streak. Both actors have an unique voice and add something to the lines they speak. Well, lets face it, this is film noir and nobody does it better then Bogart. High Sierra 2-I Died a Thousand Times 1

highsierra5

Round 4: Female Lead

Ida Lupino actually got top billing over Bogart in High Sierra. She was the bigger star at this point in time. Lupino is a film noir legend as an actress and director. I love everything I’ve seen involving Lupino so far. Shelley Winters stars in I Died and adds quite a bit more depth to this character for me. Lupino’s Marie has it together, while Winters’ Marie is trying to survive in a dark world without many options. Winters’ Marie made me believe Roy was her last hope, where I felt Lupino would land on her feet if she lost Roy. Though I loved them both, I’m giving this round to Winters. High Sierra 2- I Died a Thousand Times 2

63992668

Round 5: Supporting Cast

Arthur Kennedy and Alan Curtis are very good as Red and Babe, but Earl Holliman and Lee Marvin seem to be more dark for me. I also liked Lon Chaney Jr. as Big Mac in I Died, but liked Henry Hull as ‘Doc’ Banton in High Sierra. The dogs are both entertaining as Pard. I’m going with I Died for this round. High Sierra 2- I Died a Thousand Times 3

i-died-2

Well it looks like the remake wins this round by round battle, but lets face it, there was actually a knock out in Round 3 and the fight was called. It’s Bogart after all! Both of these films are great, but High Sierra is a classic for a reason. Though if you have not seen I Died a Thousand Times, you should, it is a bit of a hidden gem from the classic film noir era. I enjoyed both films and if High Sierra was never made, we would be talking about the great classic I Died a Thousand Times. Lets face it, High Sierra is a film that never needed a remake, but if you have to make one, I Died a Thousand Times is as good a remake as you are going to find. Maybe on a Sunday afternoon you will have to watch this double feature and let me know your thoughts.

humphrey-bogart-high-sierra

 

7 thoughts on “Film vs. Film: High Sierra vs I Died a Thousand Times

  1. I like both of these pictures (and definitely agree that Shelley Winters is absolutely excellent in her role), but I think you gave the title to the right contender. The Bogie picture is a much more memorable experience.

    Another noir that was remade within the noir cycle: I Wake Up Screaming (1941) as Vicki (1953); in this case, the original film wins out by a country mile.

    Like

  2. Well done! I have never sat down and scoped out the differences to this degree but though I love the cast surrounding Palance and Jack of course I have always felt that something was just “off” a bit and prefer Bogie but after all it is Bogart and maybe I just bought in to the legend years ago as a kid and that’s all it takes.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I just read the book, having seen both movies (and the western with Joel McCrea). I ended up liking the novel best, sue me. It has more character depth than either film has time for. Marie definitely is a lot more like Lupino than Winters–Palance resembles Roy more than Bogart in that they’re both big guys, and Bogie isn’t–but he looks too young. Roy, in the novel and the original film were modeled after John Dillinger, who in the novel was Roy’s mentor. The reason Bogart’s temples are bleached gray is that’s how Dillinger looked when he was gunned down. The original idea was to make a movie about him, the studio nixed it, and Burnett repurposed his reseach to write the novel, which Hollywood was fine with, since it wasn’t about a real criminal. Sterling Hayden might have been better than any of them, but he was far too young in 1940.

    I don’t agree Winters is better because she couldn’t do better than Roy. That’s not the point of the story. Point is, these are two of Life’s Losers who find each other, and experience real love before it’s too late for either of them. Age doesn’t enter into it. Anyway, it’s not at all clear in the novel what happened to Marie. I’m curious as to why the decision was made to change the ending for the film–but given that Warners was pushing Lupino much harder than Bogart at the time, and she had top billing, she had to be there for the big finish. She’s much more ambiguously there at the end of the novel. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn Burnett was okay with changing the end–it’s maybe the one difference between book and film that bothered me. The book is damn good, though. Deeper. Books usually are.

    Like

Leave a reply to bryancyr Cancel reply